gno.law

Dalmazzo v. Drysdale

California Supreme Court · No. 12,956 · 1889-05-15 · Published · 3 Cal. Unrep. 84 · 21 P. 553

DALMAZZO v. DRYSDALE

Area
civil
Panel
William H. Beatty (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Beatty

BEATTY, C. J.

This case was submitted without oral argument on briefs to be filed, the appellants to file the first brief. The time allowed appellants to file their brief has elapsed, no brief has been filed by appellants, no extension of time has been asked, and respondent moves for affirmance of the judgment and order appealed from. Where appellant fails to point out any error in the judgment or order appealed from, the court will not look into the record for the purpose of discovering error. Judgment and order affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.