Martin v. Splivalo
MARTIN v. SPLIVALO
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- John D. Works (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Works
WORKS, J.
This is an appeal from a money judgment recovered by the respondent against the appellants. The record shows no errors. None of the pleadings or.proceedings in the court below, prior to the judgment, appear in the transcript, and the evidence is not brought up. In this condition of the record we must presume that the judgment appealed from was right. Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent damages.
We concur: Beatty, C. J.; Paterson, J.