Mair v. Forbes
MAIR v. FORBES
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- William H. Beatty (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Beatty
BEATTY, C. J.
Action upon bill of exchange against executors of deceased acceptor. The pleadings are verified. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff on the pleadings, defendants excepting. We think the answer was sufficient to raise an issue as to the ownership of the bill, and consequently that the rendition of the judgment without any proof of plaintiff’s title was error. Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
We concur: Works, J.; Paterson, J.