Welsh v. Gould
WELSH, Road Overseer v. GOULD
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Hayne (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Hayne
HAYNE, C.
The question upon which this case turns is whether there was a public road through the land of defendant. The court below found that there was not. And we cannot say upon the record before us that its action should be disturbed. We therefore advise that the judgment and order appealed from be affirmed.
We concur: Belcher, C. C.; Foote, C.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment and order are affirmed.