Wixon v. Devine
WIXON v. DEVINE
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- A. V. Paterson (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Paterson
PATERSON, J.
1. The judgment of the court below was entered on July 6, 1887. Notice of appeal was filed and served nearly a year thereafter, to wit, June 29, 1888. As there was no motion for a new trial, therefore, the evidence should not be considered.
2. There are no assignments of error, or specifications of insufficiency of the evidence, in the bill of exceptions.
3. The findings cover the issues, are against the appellant, and, although the record is not in a condition to require of us an examination of the evidence, it is apparent from a cursory review of it that the findings are correct.
Judgment affirmed.
We concur: Works, J.; Sharpstein, J.; Thornton, J.; McFarland, J.