Scott v. Sowden
SCOTT v. SOWDEN, Justice of the Peace
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Foote (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Foote
FOOTE, C.
There being no appearance on the part of the appellant, and no points or authorities filed on his behalf, the judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed.
We concur: Belcher, C. C.; Hayne, C.
Per CURIAM.
For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
Cited by
- Teilhet v. County of Santa Clara Civ. 16948 · 1957-03-20
- Peek v. Peek No. 12315 · 1888-03-20