Whyler v. Van Tiger
WHYLER and Another v. VAN TIGER
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the COURT.
There is no error in the record. We think that Mrs. Whyler was a guardian when she executed the lease to defendant, and that, the lease was properly executed.
The judgment must be affirmed. So ordered.
Cited by
- Bessho v. General Petroleum Corp. L. A. No. 6116. · 1921-06-11
- Southern T. C. Bk. v. S.D. Sav. Bk. Civ. No. 3168. · 1919-12-27
- Southern Trust & Commerce Bank v. San Diego Savings Bank Civ. No. 3168 · 1919-12-27
- In Re the Guardianship of the Persons & Estates of Morehouse S. F. No. 8323. · 1917-12-07
- Elizalde v. Elizalde L.A. No. 851. · 1902-11-15
- Dennis v. Bint L. A. No. 235 · 1898-09-01