Goodwin v. Burney
GOODWIN v. BURNEY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Foote (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Foote
FOOTE, C.
This was an action of ejectment for a tract of land. As to the facts given in evidence going to show the plaintiff’s legal possession of the premises in dispute, prior to the defendant’s entry thereupon, and as to those relative to the character of the defendant’s entry, whether or not it was in good faith, and under a claim of right adverse to that of the plaintiff, there is a decided conflict, for which reason the order refusing a new trial should be affirmed.
We concur: Belcher, C. C.; Hayne, C.
By the COURT.—For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the order is affirmed.