Childs v. Edmunds
CHILDS v. EDMUNDS, Judge, etc.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the COURT.
The application for a writ of prohibition in this case is denied for the reason that petitioner has an adequate remedy by appeal from the order complained of.
Cited by
- Havemeyer v. Superior Court No. 13709 · 1890-06-09