Shuffleton v. Hill
SHUFFLETON v. HILL
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the COURT.
We are of opinion that, under the contract and lease, Greenlaw, in the first instance, and Hill, as *474his successor, owned the logs until delivery in the boom at the mill. Such being the case, plaintiff was entitled to an enforcement of his lien, irrespective of advances made by Vance to Hill.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with instructions to enter judgment for plaintiff.
Cited by
- Virden v. Neese Civ. 7064 · 1944-11-09