Nelson v. Floyd
NELSON v. FLOYD FRASER v. NELSON and Another
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Outcome
- affirmed — Order affirmed.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the COURT.
Appeals from an order granting a new trial. The decision and judgment, which the court set aside, were founded upon substantially conflicting evidence, bearing upon the main questions, as issue between the parties, as to the existence and extent of the subordinate claims and liens against the building- in controversy; and as the court set the judgment aside and granted a new trial upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to justify them, this court, in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion, will not disturb the order: Guttierrez v. Brinkerhoff, 9 Pac. C. L. J. 734; Blum v. Sunol, 63 Cal. 341, 11 Pac. C. L. J. 275; Pierce v. Schaden, 55 Cal. 406; Bronner v. Wetzlar, 55 Cal. 419.
Order affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Blum v. Sunol · 1883-04-24
- Pierce v. Schaden No. 6,800 · 1880-07-01
- Bronner v. Wetzlar No. 6,024 · 1880-07-01