People v. Long
PEOPLE v. THOMAS M. LONG
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Richard W. Rhodes (author), William T. Wallace, Niles
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Rhodes
RHODES, J.
— It being admitted on the argument that there was no evidence to prove the corpus delicti in the case other than the evidence of the confessions of the defendant, and that alone not being sufficient to justify a conviction (People v. Jones, 31 Cal. 565), it is ordered that the judgment be reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
We concur: Wallace, J.; Niles, J.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Jones · 1867-07-01