Hoffman v. Felt
FREDERICK HOFFMAN v. CHARLES FELT
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Silas S. Sanderson (author), Richard W. Rhodes, Brian S. Currey, Shatter
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Sanderson
SANDERSON, J.
It was not error to nonsuit the plaintiffs upon the opening statement of their counsel. The plaintiffs cannot recover in ejectment without title, or prior possession, which is evidence of title. According to the statement of counsel the plaintiffs have neither. What other remedy they may have is not involved in this case.
Judgment affirmed.
We concur: Shatter, J.; Rhodes, J.; Currey, C. J.