Ogilvie v. Barry
OGILVIE v. BARRY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Sitafter (author), Richard W. Rhodes, Silas S. Sanderson, Sawyer
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Sitafter
SITAFTER, J.- The only question in this case is whether the evidence is sufficient to justify the findings. It may be conceded that the findings are contrary to the weight of the evidence, but the case is not one in which under the settled doctrines of this court we can grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
We concur: Rhodes, J.; Sanderson, J.; Sawyer, J.