Miles v. Thorne
MILES v. THORNE
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Sawyer (author), Richard W. Rhodes, Silas S. Sanderson, Brian S. Currey, Shatter
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Sawyer
SAWYER, J.
This is an action for dissolution of an alleged partnership for an account.
It is insisted that judgment on the facts should have been for plaintiff. We think not. They do not show a partnership. The most that can be claimed for them is, that defendant verbally promised that plaintiff should have one-half the road, and then refused to execute the promise. This does not constitute a partnership.
Judgment affirmed.
We concur: Sanderson, C. J.; Shatter, J.; Currey, J.; Rhodes, J.