gno.law

McClelland v. King Solomon Gold & Silver Quartz Mining Co.

California Supreme Court · No. 448 · 1865-03-06 · Published · 1 Cal. Unrep. 205

S. B. McCLELLAND v. THE KING SOLOMON GOLD AND SILVER QUARTZ MINING COMPANY

Area
civil
Panel
Sawyer (author), Richard W. Rhodes, Silas S. Sanderson, Brian S. Currey, Shatter

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Sawyer

SAWYER, J.

We -think the sixty days commenced to run from the date of the location. If so, the facts appearing in the verdict -and stipulation are sufficient to sustain the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

We concur: Sanderson, C. J.; Rhodes, J.; Currey, J.; Shatter, J.