Lomax v. Cooper
JOHN LOMAX v. EZEKIEL COOPER
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Silas S. Sanderson (author), Sawyer, Shafter, Brian S. Currey
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Sanderson
SANDERSON, C. J.
This action was brought to enjoin the defendants from removing a building from a lot in the city of San Francisco alleged to belong to the plaintiff. The case was tried by a referee who found the facts and reported a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal.
*148The only point made by counsel for appellants is that the finding of the referee is contrary to the evidence. We have carefully read all the evidence contained in the record and are satisfied that it fully sustains the finding.
Judgment affirmed.
We concur: Currey, J.; Sawyer, J.; Shafter, J.