Thurn v. Swain
THURN v. SWAIN
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Cope (author), Stephen J. Field, Joseph G. Baldwin
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Cope
COPE, J.
This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. We always interfere in such eases with great reluctance, and never exercise our revisory authority except to correct an abuse of discretion. We think the purposes of justice do not require our interposition in this cause, and we are by no means clear that great injustice might not be done by a .contrary course.
The order is affirmed.
We concur: Field, C. J.; Baldwin, J.