People ex rel. Bunnell v. Hager
PEOPLE ex rel. JOHN E. BUNNELL v. J. S. HAGER
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Joseph G. Baldwin (author), Stephen J. Field, Cope, Iwe
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Baldwin
BALDWIN, J.
The judgment by default in this case is erroneous. The judgment is for, among other things, contingent tax, and, for the year 1859, for building tax levied by the board of supervisors. We have been referred to no authority for levying these items, and yet judgment is given *93for them. The judgment so far is wholly unauthorized, the complaint showing no cause of action as to those items. As judgment was rendered in the absence of defendants, we think it best to remand the ease that he may set up his defense, if he has any, except as above indicated.
So ordered.
iWe concur: Field, C. J.; Cope, J.