gno.law

Myers v. Liening

California Supreme Court · No. 2302 · 1859-11-04 · Published · 1 Cal. Unrep. 78

JOHN P. MYERS v. J. K. LIENING

Area
civil
Panel
Joseph G. Baldwin (author), Stephen J. Field

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Baldwin

BALDWIN, J.

— There are two sufficient reasons why we cannot take notice of the errors assigned by the appellant: 1. The judgment below is for less than two hundred dollars— and we have no jurisdiction; 2. There was no motion for a new trial below and no exception taken to instructions — for alleged error in which the appeal is taken.

The appeal is dismissed.

I concur: Field, C. J.