gno.law

Baker v. Scannell

California Supreme Court · No. 1754 · 1859-04-02 · Published · 1 Cal. Unrep. 72

FRANK BAKER v. DAVID SCANNELL

Area
civil
Panel
Joseph G. Baldwin (author), Stephen J. Field

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Baldwin

BALDWIN, J.

— The injunction in this ease should have been dissolved on the answers and affidavits. The main question is as to the fraud in the making of the note of Watson to Clement, and the allegations of the bill in this respect are fully denied. The denials, certainly, are quite as circumstantial and positive as the charges.

The order is reversed and the injunction dissolved, and cause remanded.

I concur: Field, J.