People v. Godkins
PEOPLE v. JOHN GODKINS
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author), Albert G. Burnett
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
TERRY, J.
— There is in the record no settled or agreed statement of the ease nor bill of exceptions setting out the evidence. The only exception in the record is the refusal of the court below to grant a new trial, on account of errors occurring at the trial and erroneous instructions given by the court, but as the bill sets out neither the evidence nor the instructions, we cannot review the decision of the judge below: People v. Lafuente [6 Cal. 202] and People v. Lockwood [6 Cal. 205], April term, 1856.
Judgment affirmed.
I concur: Burnett, J.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Lafuente · 1856-07-01
- People v. Lockwood · 1856-07-01