Johnson v. Reynolds
S. M. JOHNSON v. W. W. REYNOLDS
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author), Albert G. Burnett
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
TERRY, J.
— The only question presented by the record is whether, under our statute, things in action are property and subject to be taken in execution.
This point was fully considered in the ease of Adams & Co. v. Hackett & Casserly, [7 Cal. 187], decided at this term, and upon the authority of that case the judgment of the court below is reversed and cause remanded.
I concur: Burnett, J.
Cites, in this corpus
- Adams v. Hackett · 1857-07-01