Molle v. Jacob Kohlberg & Co.
VICTOR MOLLE v. JACOB KOHLBERG & CO.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author), Albert G. Burnett
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
TERRY, J.
— The only error assigned is the refusal of the court to continue the cause on application of defendants.
*59"We think the continuance was properly refused. The answer was filed on the 6th of June, 1856, and no effort was made to procure the testimony until the 2d of October, when a subpoena was issued for a nonresident witness. This was not such diligence as would authorize a postponement of the cause.
Judgment affirmed.
I concur: Burnett, J.