Brown v. Vidal
ALEXANDER BROWN v. LEONARDO VIDAL, Appellant (Recorded as NEWLAND v. KEAN.)
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Solomon Heydenfeldt (author), Lawrence F. Terry
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydenfeldt
HEYDENFELDT, J.
— -There is no statement or bill of exceptions. None of the papers which appear in the transcript have any such verity as can make them portions of the record. There is left only the declaration, the answer and the judgment of dismissal.
All intendments must be in favor of sustaining the action of the district court, and although no reason appears for the dismissal of the action, it must be presumed there was a good legal one, in the absence of anything to show the contrary.
Judgment affirmed.
I concur: Terry, J.
Cited by
- Norton v. Meyers Docket No. 6696. · 1929-04-08
- Kovacevich v. Fischer Motor Body Co. Docket No. 6364. · 1928-10-20