Tryon v. Stratton
JAMES TRYON v. DECATUR STRATTON and L. B. VAIL
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author), Tleydenfeldt
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
TERRY. J.
— The report of the referee in this case does not state the facts found by him. In the case of Lambert v. Smith & McGHlrey, 3 Cal. 408, the court held “that” the report of a referee like the finding of a court should state the facts found and the conclusions of law. Without this the parties would be remediless and their rights concluded in many cases by the arbitrary decision of a referee.
The judgment of the court below is reversed and the cause remanded.
I concur: Tleydenfeldt, J.
Cites, in this corpus
- Lambert v. M'Gilvery · 1853-10-15