O'Connor v. Hammond
HUGH O'CONNOR v. JOHN HAMMOND
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author), Solomon Heydenfeldt
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
TERRY, J.
— This cause was tried below by a jury, and the evidence fully sustains the judgment and there is no error on the record.
The witness Barney, who testified on behalf of plaintiff, was incompetent, on account of interest, ánd would no doubt have been excluded if the objection had. been taken on the trial. This was not done, and the point cannot be raised here for the first time.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
I concur: Heydenfeldt, J.