gno.law

San Jose Teachers Ass'n v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court · S.F. No. 24793 · 1986-06-26 · Published · 42 Cal. 3d 130 · 719 P.2d 682 · 227 Cal. Rptr. 112 · 1986 Cal. LEXIS 198

SAN JOSE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY, Respondent SANDRA ABERNATHY, Real Parties in Interest

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

ORDER OF THE COURT.

On March 10, 1986, the Supreme Court of the United States granted a petition for writ of certiorari in this case [38 Cal.3d 839 (215 Cal.Rptr. 250, 700 P.2d 1252)] and ordered that “the judgment of the above court in this cause is vacated with costs, and that this cause is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1, AFT, AFL CIO v. Hudson, 475 U.S. 292 (1986).” (No. 85-498.)

Upon receipt of the mandate of the Supreme Court we solicited further briefs from petitioner and the real parties in interest as to the impact of the court’s decision in Chicago Teachers Union. Those briefs have been received and considered.

It appearing that the parties are in agreement that the petition for writ of mandate should be denied, the remittitur is recalled, our judgment directing that a writ of mandate issue is vacated, the alternative writ is discharged, and the petition for writ of mandate is denied.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by