gno.law

In re Wein

California Supreme Court · Crim. No. 14254 · 1971-05-28 · Published · 5 Cal. 3d 47 · 484 P.2d 1356 · 95 Cal. Rptr. 12 · 1971 Cal. LEXIS 234

In re EDWARD SIMON WEIN on Habeas Corpus

Area
other

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

Opinion THE COURT.

We treat the petition as a motion to recall the remittitur in People v. Wein, 50 Cal.2d 383 [326 P.2d 457]. The motion is granted. The remittitur issued on June 27, 1958, is recalled. The judgment is vacated on counts 1, 5, 9, 14, 17, 18, 21, and is affirmed on all other counts. (People v. Daniels, 71 Cal.2d 1119, 1140 [80 Cal.Rptr. 897, 459 P.2d 225]; People v. Mutch, 4 Cal.3d 389 [93 Cal.Rptr. 721, 482 P.2d 633].)

Mosk, J., and Sullivan, J., did not participate.

Cites, in this corpus