gno.law

Parrish v. Bob Keefer Plymouth, Inc.

California Supreme Court · L. A. No. 26299 · 1962-06-21 · Published · 58 Cal. 2d 920 · 22 Cal. Rptr. 663 · 372 P.2d 655 · 1962 Cal. LEXIS 321

EDWARD PARRISH, and v. BOB KEEFER PLYMOUTH, INC., and

Area
civil
Panel
B R. Schauer (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Schauer

SCHAUER, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs in an action to declare unenforceable a conditional sale contract for the sale of an automobile and to recover the amount of plaintiffs’ down payment on such automobile.

The trial court based its judgment upon the following conclusion of law: ‘‘That the Conditional Sales Contract . . . violated the provisions of [now former] Civil Code Section 2982 (a) 5, in that the description, ‘License and Registration $27.00’ is not a sufficient compliance with the provisions of that section.”

Such conclusion is untenable. The quoted language constitutes full compliance with the subject section. (See Stasher v. Harger-Haldeman, ante, p. 23 [22 Cal.Rptr. 657, 372 P.2d 649].)

The judgment is reversed.

Gibson, C. J., Traynor, J., Me Comb, J., Peters, J., White, J., and Dooling, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus