People v. Federal Land Bank
THE PEOPLE v. THE FEDERAL LAND BANK OF BERKELEY (a Corporation)
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
This action was brought to declare an escheat of real property held by aliens ineligible for American citizenship. Subsequent to the noticing of the appeal, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Oyama v. State of California, 832 U.S. 633 [68 S.Ct. 269, 92 L.Ed. -], and the parties hereto, conceding that the Oyama decision is° controlling of the issues presented here, have filed a stipulation for reversal of the judgment.
Judgment is therefore reversed, each side to bear its own costs on appeal, and remittitur to issue forthwith.
Cited by
- Gonzalez v. Hirose L. A. 19942 · 1948-12-23