Weston v. Superior Court
KEN WESTON v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Jesse W. Carter (author), John W. Shenk
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Carter
CARTER, J.
This is a review of a contempt judgment and commitment. Following the commencement of an action for injunctive relief and damages in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County by Calavo Growers of California, a nonprofit association, and Calavo, Incorporated, a corporation, plaintiffs, against petitioner, a member of a union, and various unions, a temporary restraining order was issued enjoining petitioner and other defendants from agreeing to cease performing or to cause any employee of customers, suppliers or carriers of plaintiffs to cease dealing with plaintiffs. Like in In re Blaney, 30 Cal.2d 643 [184 P.2d 892], a judgment of commitment on conviction of contempt was entered reciting that the action was. to secure injunctive relief for a violation of the “hot cargo act,” and finding several counts of violation of the restraining order similar to those discussed in the Blaney ease. For the reasons stated in that case the judgment and warrant of commitment of petitioner on conviction of contempt of court are annulled.
Gibson, C. J., Edmonds, J., Traynor, J., Schauer, J., and Spence, J., concurred.
Dissent — Shenk
SHENK, J.
I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in In re Blaney, 30 Cal.2d 643, at page 661 [184 P.2d 892].
Cites, in this corpus
- In Re Blaney Crim. 4733 · 1947-10-03