Caminetti v. Superior Court
A. CAMINETTI, Jr., as Insurance Commissioner, etc. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Douglas L. Edmonds (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
The facts and issues presented in this proceeding are substantially similar to those involved in Caminetti v. Superior Court, S. F. 16479 (ante, p. 838 [108 Pac. (2d) 911]), this day decided. For the reasons therein advanced and upon the authority thereof, let peremptory writs of prohibition and mandate issue respectively restraining the respondent Superior Court from taking any further steps or proceedings in the conservatorship proceeding pending therein, and directing it to transfer the same to the Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles.
Gibson, C. J., did not participate in the decision.
Dissent — Edmonds
EDMONDS, J., Dissenting.
For the reasons stated by me in Caminetti v. Superior Court of San Francisco, No. 16,479, I am of the opinion that the writs sought by the applicant should be denied.
Rehearing denied. Edmonds, J., voted for a rehearing.
Cites, in this corpus
- Caminetti v. Superior Court S. F. 16479 · 1941-01-06