Johnson v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los Angeles
HAROLD MEAD JOHNSON v. CITIZENS NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK OF LOS ANGELES (a Banking Association)
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Douglas L. Edmonds (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Edmonds
EDMONDS, J.
The appellant in this ease is the purchaser of land under á contract made with Harold G. Ferguson Corporation. He later surrendered it for one with Quartz Hill Land and Development Company. He is in exactly the same position as the appellants in the case of Hill v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los Angeles, L. A. No. 15079, this day decided (ante, p. 172 [69 Pac. (2d) 853]), and the facts are substantially the same in both cases. The cases were tried together and the same principles apply to each.
For the reasons stated in the Hill case the judgment is affirmed.
Shenk, J., Curtis, J., and Langdon, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Hill v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los Angeles L. A. No. 15079 · 1937-06-29