Los Angeles Lime Co. v. Adams

California Supreme Court · L. A. No. 15717; L. A. No. 15718; L. A. No. 15719; L. A. No. 15720 · 1936-07-20 · Published · 7 Cal. 2d 770 · 59 P.2d 1032 · 1936 Cal. LEXIS 707

LOS ANGELES LIME COMPANY (a Corporation) v. L. L. ADAMS, Respondents LLEWELLYN IRON WORKS (a Corporation) v. L. L. ADAMS, Respondents PACIFIC COAST STEEL CORPORATION (a Corporation) v. L. L. ADAMS, Respondents SUNSET ROCK PRODUCTS COMPANY (a Corporation) v. L. L. ADAMS

Area: civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

These four cases are similar to the ease of Hammond Lumber Co. v. Adams, L. A. No. 15716 (ante, p. 24 [59 Pac. (2d) 1030]), this day decided, except as to plaintiffs, dates and amounts of the certificates. Upon the authority of our decision in that case, and for the reasons therein announced, we conclude that the court below properly sustained demurrers to the several complaints without leave to amend.

The judgments are, and each is affirmed.

Cites, in this corpus

Hammond Lumber Co. v. Adams L. A. No. 15716 · 1936-07-20