gno.law

McArthur v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.

California Supreme Court · Sac. No. 4711 · 1935-05-29 · Published · 3 Cal. 2d 765 · 45 P.2d 816 · 1935 Cal. LEXIS 486

RODERICK McARTHUR v. MT. SHASTA POWER CORPORATION (a Corporation)

Area
civil
Panel
Jesse W. Curtis, Sr. (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Curtis

CURTIS, J.

This action is referred to in the opinion this day filed in the ease of McArthur v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp. (Sac. No. 4765), ante, p. 704 [45 Pac. (2d) 807], and is a companion case to the Anna McArthur case. Respondent’s lands front on Pittville Pool and are located on the same side of said pool as the Anna McArthur lands, and between the two parcels of Anna McArthur lands involved in her said action against the appellant herein. The same factual situation exists in this case as was presented in the Anna McArthur case. For this reason the decision in this case must be the same as that rendered and filed in the Anna McArthur case. Upon-the authority of that case the judgment in the present action is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial on the issue of damages alone, in accordance with the views expressed in *766the opinion this day filed in the case of McArthur v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp., Sac. No. 4765. Each party to pay his own costs.

Shenk, J., Waste, C. J., Thompson, J.. Spence, J., pro tem., and Nourse, J., pro tem., concurred.

Rehearing denied.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by