Hutt v. Corser
PEARL HUTT v. J. W. CORSER
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- John W. Preston (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Preston
PRESTON, J.
Action to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. His brief presents no question of law but is at most an attempt to recite the evidence in the case, which on its face discloses not only conflicting evidence but a preponderance thereof in favor of respondent’s. claims.
The motion to dismiss the appeal heretofore made herein, and submitted, is denied. The judgment is affirmed.
Curtis, J., Langdon, J., Shenk, J., Seawell, J., Thompson, J., and Waste, C. J., concurred.