Robison v. McAlister
PEARL ROBISON v. RAYMOND P. MCALISTER, Defendants BAY CITIES TRANSIT COMPANY (a Corporation)
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Outcome
- affirmed — On the authority of that case the judgment herein is affirmed.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action for personal injuries. The facts attending a collision between the motor-bus of the defendant corporation and a Ford car driven by Raymond P. McAlister, a minor, and the questions of law presented are the same as those involved in the case of Eva M. St. Clair v. Raymond P. McAlister et al., (L. A. No. 13607) ante, p. 95 [13 Pac. (2d) 924], this day decided, except as to the name of the plaintiff, who was a passenger on the same bus at the time of the collision, the extent of the injuries, and the amount of the judgment. On the authority of that case the judgment herein is affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- St. Clair v. McAlister Docket No. L.A. 13607. · 1932-07-25