Dozier v. Chipman
THOMAS B. DOZIER, Jr. v. W. F. CHIPMAN, as Trustee, etc.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
- THE COURT.
This is a companion case to the action of Davis v. Chipman (S. F. No. 13122), ante, p. 609 [293 Pac. 40], this day decided. In that'action the facts involved in the present action are fully set forth as well as the nature of the plaintiff’s demand. It is not necessary to repeat them here. Upon the authority of Davis v. Chipman, supra, the judgment herein is reversed.
Rehearing denied.
Shenk, J., and Preston, J., dissented.
Cites, in this corpus
- Davis v. Chipman Docket No. S.F. 13122. · 1930-10-30