California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Mooney
CALIFORNIA CREDIT & COLLECTION CORPORATION v. EMMA R. D. MOONEY
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
Upon examination of the record in this case we are satisfied that the trial court was in error as to each of the two main questions presented upon this appeal. We are further satisfied that a practically parallel situation is presented upon this appeal as that presented and considered by the district court of appeal in and for the third appellate district in the cases of California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Randall (Cal. App.), 244 Pac. 958, California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Goodin (Cal. App.), 246 Pac. 121, and California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Carpenter (Cal. App.), 246 Pac. 126.
In the latter two of the above .cases a petition for hearing in this court was denied. Upon the authority of these cases the judgment herein is reversed.
Cites, in this corpus
- California Credit & Collection Co. v. Carpenter Docket No. 2823. · 1926-03-10
- California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Goodin Docket No. 2935. · 1926-03-08
- California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Randall Docket No. 2956. · 1926-01-27