gno.law

In re Biardo

California Supreme Court · Crim. No. 2737; Crim. No. 2738; Crim. No. 2739; Crim. No. 2740 · 1925-04-11 · Published · 195 Cal. 778

In the Matter of the Application of ANGELO BIARDO for a Writ of Habeas Corpus In the Matter of the Application of JACK BIARDO for a Writ of Habeas Corpus In the Matter of the Application of JOHN CERRUTI for a Writ of Habeas Corpus In the Matter of the Application of G. SPORTUNIO for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Area
other

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

The precise point is presented in each of the above-entitled 'petitions as was presented and decided this day in Ex parte Berto, ante, p. 774 [235 Pac. 735]. Upon the authority of that case the writ is discharged and the petitioner remanded in each of the above-entitled matters.

Cites, in this corpus