Hartigan v. Jordan
WILLIAM HARTIGAN v. FRANK C. JORDAN, as Secretary of the State of California
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
[1] Petitioner’s nomination papers under section 1188 of the Political Code were not presented to the *73registrar of the city and county of San Francisco for examination until September 25, 1920. This was not forty days prior to the general election of November 2, 1920. It results that he is not entitled to have his name go on the ballot. (Pol. Code, sec. 1188; Primary Law, sec. 5, [Stats. 1913, p. 1383].)
The application is denied.
All the Justices concurred.