People v. Eilersficken
THE PEOPLE v. FREDERICK R. C. EILERSFICKEN
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Henry A. Melvin (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Melvin
MELVIN, J.
The questions involved in the appeals herein from the judgment and from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial are the same as those which arose in the appeals in People v. Jordan, Crim. 1973 (opinion filed March 24,1916), ante, p. 391, and upon the authority of that case the judgment and order are affirmed.
Henshaw, J., Sloss, J., Shaw, J., Lawlor, J., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred.