gno.law

Finance & Construction Co. v. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District

California Supreme Court · Sac. No. 2346; Sac. No. 2347; Sac. No. 2348; Sac. No. 2349; Sac. No. 2350 · 1915-10-18 · Published · 171 Cal. 804

FINANCE AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA (a Corporation) v. SACRAMENTO AND SAN JOAQUIN DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Appellant W. W. BASSETT v. SACRAMENTO AND SAN JOAQUIN DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Appellant LIZZIE H. GLIDE v. SACRAMENTO AND SAN JOAQUIN DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Appellant SPARROW SMITH and W. W. BASSETT v. SACRAMENTO AND SAN JOAQUIN DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Appellant J. H. GLIDE and T. S. GLIDE v. SACRAMENTO AND SAN JOAQUIN DRAINAGE DISTRICT

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

The questions presented on the above-entitled appeals are the same as those involved in Gallup et al. v. Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District, Sac. No. 2351, decided September 21st, 1915, ante, p. 71, [151 Pac. 1142], and upon the authority of that case the orders appealed from are reversed.

Cites, in this corpus