Rice v. Carey
J. R. RICE, Executors of the Last Will of James M. Hood v. GEORGIENE RUTH CAREY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- M. C. Sloss (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Sloss
SLOSS, J.
This action involves the validity of a deed claimed to have been executed by J. M. Hood in his lifetime to Georgiene Ruth Carey, his granddaughter. The case is essentially similar in its facts and in the law applicable thereto to Rice v. Carey (Sac. No. 2145), ante, p. 748, [151 Pac. 135], just decided. Here, as there, the judgment went in favor of the plaintiffs and the defendant appeals.
For the reasons stated in the decision just referred to, the action of the superior court in the case at bar must be upheld.
The judgment is affirmed.
Shaw, J., Melvin, J., Lorigan, J., Henshaw, J., Lawlor, J., and, Angellotti, C. J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Rice v. Carey Sac. No. 2145. · 1915-08-05