People v. Dunleavy

California Supreme Court · Crim. No. 1784a; Crim. No. 1784b; Crim. No. 1784c; Crim. No. 1784d · 1913-09-30 · Published · 166 Cal. 779

THE PEOPLE v. FRANK DUNLEAVY, Respondent THE PEOPLE v. HENRY FREEDMAN, Respondent THE PEOPLE v. A. JOHNSON, Respondent THE PEOPLE v. JOSEPH SMITH

Area: criminal

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

Each of the appeals in the above entitled causes presents the same questions that are presented in People v. Plath, (Crim. No. 1784), ante, p. 227, [135 Pac. 954.] Upon the authority of the last named case, the action of the trial court in each of the above entitled eases must be affirmed.

The judgments appealed from are affirmed.

Cites, in this corpus

People v. Plath Crim. No. 1784. · 1913-09-30