gno.law

Haun v. Robinson

California Supreme Court · S. F. No. 5793 · 1912-01-18 · Published · 162 Cal. 760

JOSEPH P. HAUN v. F. E. ROBINSON

Proceeding
appeal
Trial court
superior court of the city and county of San Francisco to the superior court of Los Angeles County on the ground that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change
Outcome
affirmed — 3.) The order was affirmed from the bench for the reason that it satisfactorily appeared to the court that there was a sufficient showing made by the affidavit in support of the motion to sustain the conclusion of the lower court that “the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice” would be promoted by such a change.
Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

Appeal from an order granting a change of place of trial from the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco to the superior court of Los Angeles County on the ground that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 397, subd. 3.)

The order was affirmed from the bench for the reason that it satisfactorily appeared to the court that there was a sufficient showing made by the affidavit in support of the motion to sustain the conclusion of the lower court that “the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice” would be promoted by such a change.