Frank v. State
MAX FRANK v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- M. C. Sloss (author), Shaw, Frank M. Angellotti, Henry A. Melvin, Frederick W. Henshaw, William G. Lorigan
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Sloss
SLOSS, J.
The plaintiff, as holder of sixty-five Montgomery Avenue bonds and 2,975 coupons, sues to recover the amount of said bonds and coupons from the state of California. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendant upon the sustaining of its demurrer to the complaint.
The complaint is in all substantial particulars identical with that in Union Trust Company of San Francisco against the State of California, Sacramento No. 1570, ante p. 716, [99 Pac. 183], decided this day, and for the reasons stated -in the •opinion in that ease it must be held that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.
The judgment is affirmed.
Angellotti, J., Shaw, J., Lorigan, J., Henshaw, J., and Melvin, J., concurred.