gno.law

McConoughey v. Torrence

California Supreme Court · L. A. No. 722 · 1899-04-21 · Published · 124 Cal. 330 · 57 P. 81 · 1899 Cal. LEXIS 994

A. M. McCONOUGHEY v. E. S. TORRENCE, Judge of Superior Court of San Diego County

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondent to settle a statement on appeal. The appeal was taken within sixty days after July 28, 1898. The refusal *331to settle the statement was made final and definite by an order of respondent made and entered October 11, 1898. This proceeding to compel settlement was not commenced until March 24, 1899, and the application must be denied upon the ground of laches. (Depeaux v. Peck, 118 Cal. 522.)

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by