Angus v. Plum
J. S. ANGUS v. CHARLES M. PLUM
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
The judgment in this case must be affirmed on the authority of San Gabriel Co. v. Witmer Co., 96 Cal. 623. The clause of the constitution upon which the rights of parties depend was construed in that case, and the court was very evenly divided. We are now asked to overrule the decision then made, but, whether that decismn was right or wrong, it has been since acted upon, and was acted upon by the parties to this contro*609versy, and we consider that it is protected by the rule of stare decisis.
J udgment affirmed.
Temple, J., dissented.
Cites, in this corpus
- San Gabriel Valley Land & Water Co. v. Witmer Bros. No. 14324 · 1892-12-02
Cited by
- State of California v. Superior Court Civ. 10206 · 1936-06-23
- William Ede Co. v. Heywood S.F. No. 4842. · 1908-05-20
- Henry v. Garden City Bank & Tr. Co. of San Jose S.F. No. 3387. · 1904-10-01